MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165242341 · doi:10.2138/am-2015-4779

Chlorine-hydroxyl diffusion in pargasitic amphibole

2014· article· fr· W2165242341 on OpenAlexaff
Wei‐Fang Su, Don R. Baker, Limeng Pu, Liping Bai, Xingyuan Liu, Cedrick O’Shaughnessy

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAmphiboleElectron microprobeDiffusionChlorineArrhenius equationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryActivation energyMineralogyThermodynamicsMaterials sciencePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chlorine-hydroxyl diffusion was measured in pargasitic amphibole from Yunnan province, China at 1.0 GPa, 625 to 800 °C. Experiments were performed by immersing unoriented crystals in waterbearing NaCl in a piston cylinder for durations from 100 to 454 h. Diffusion profiles were on the order of greater than tens of micrometers in length, and electron microprobe analysis allow us to extract semi-quantitative diffusivities from these experiments. The preliminary diffusion coefficients for chlorine in amphibole in the water-bearing experiments are 2.6 × 10-16 m2/s at 625 °C, 4.9 × 10-16 m2/s at 650 °C, 7.6 × 10-16 m2/s at 700 °C, 1.8 × 10-15 m2/s at 750 °C, 2.8 × 10-15 m2/s at 800 °C. For temperatures between 625 and 800 °C, the Arrhenius relation for chlorine-hydroxyl diffusion has an activation energy of 106.6 ± 7.8 kJ/K mol and a D0 of 4.53 (+7.3, -2.8) × 10-10 m2/s. Our measurements do not show evidence of anisotropy in the diffusion of Cl-OH into amphibole, but future experiments need to better investigate this possibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207