MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165262883 · doi:10.1190/1.1707051

Downhole seismic imaging of a massive sulfide orebody with mode-converted waves, Halfmile Lake, New Brunswick, Canada

2004· article· en· W2165262883 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gilles Bellefleur, Christof Müller, D. B. Snyder, Larry Matthews

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsShell (Canada)Geological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyVertical seismic profileSeismologySeismic explorationGeophysical imagingSulfideScatteringSeismic waveMineralogySeismic migrationMode (computer interface)GeophysicsOpticsMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Multioffset, multiazimuth downhole seismic data were acquired at Halfmile Lake, New Brunswick, to image known massive sulfide lenses and to investigate the potential existence of a steeply dipping mineralized zone connecting them. The massive sulfide lenses, which have significantly higher elastic impedances than host rocks, produce strong scattering. The downhole seismic data show prominent scattered (P-P and S-S) and mode-converted (P-S and S-P) waves originating from the deposit. Such complex scattering from massive sulfide ore was not observed previously in vertical seismic profiling data. Migration of the scattered and mode-converted waves from several shot points imaged different parts of the deepest lens. The scattered S-waves and mode-converted waves provide additional imaging capabilities that should be considered when selecting downhole seismic methods for mining exploration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207