MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165268218

"Stand by the Union, Mr. Arch": The Toronto Labour Establishment and the Emigration Mission of Britain's National Agricultural Labourers' Union

2005· article· en· W2165268218 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
David Goutor

Bibliographic record

VenueLabour / Le Travail · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmigrationPolitical scienceImmigrationPoliticsEconomic historyEconomyEthnologySociologyLawEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the fall of 1873 Joseph Arch, the President of the England’s National Agricultural Labourers’ Union (NALU), embarked on a mission to scout Canada as an emigration destination. He was received with much hospitality in Canada. Large-scale migration of British farm-workers had the support of an extraordinary consensus between the NALU, Canadian political and business elites, and the Toronto labour leaders who wielded enormous influence over the labour movement in Ontario. The consensus was the result of developments in British agricultural unionism, Ontario’s farming sector, Canada’s immigration policy, and the Toronto labour establishment’s approach to immigration. However, during the mission, tensions emerged between Arch and the Toronto labour establishment that strained the appearance of international union solidarity. These tensions revealed the treacherous nature of a relationship between labour leaders in an immigrant-receiving country, and an organization, even a union, looking to promote emigration. Resume En automne 1873, Joseph Arch, president du Syndicat national des travailleurs agricoles d’Angleterre, s’est embarque dans une mission visant a decouvrir le Canada comme destination d’emigration. Il a ete recu avec beaucoup d’hospitalite au Canada. La migration de grande envergure des travailleurs agricoles britanniques avait l’appui d’un consensus extraordinaire entre le syndicat anglais, les elites politiques et commerciales canadiennes et les chefs syndicalistes torontois qui avaient exerce d’enorme influence sur le mouvement syndical en Ontario. Le consensus etait le resultat des developpements du syndicalisme agricole britannique, du secteur agricole de l’Ontario, de la politique d’immigration canadienne et de l’approche a l’immigration des syndicats torontois. Toutefois, durant la mission, des tensions se sont declarees entre Arch et les syndicats torontois, ce qui a mis a l’epreuve l’apparence de la solidarite syndicale internationale. Ces tensions ont revele la nature perfide d’une relation entre les chefs syndicalistes dans un pays qui recevait les immigrants et un organisme, meme un syndicat, qui cherchait a promouvoir l’emigration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLabour / Le TravailSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207