Pig slurry reduces the survival of<i>Ralstonia solanacearum</i>biovar 2 in soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of added pig slurry and solarization on the survival of Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 2 strain 1609 in soil was analysed in soil microcosms and field plots. In addition, the invasion of potato plants by R. solanacearum and the development of disease symptoms were determined, as measures of induced disease suppressiveness. In untreated soil, R. solanacearum showed slow population declines in both microcosms and the field from, initially, 10(6-)10(7) to 10(3)-10(4) CFU.(g dry soil)(-1) in about 9 weeks. The suppressiveness assays of these untreated soils after this period revealed that most of the plants that were used developed wilting symptoms and (or) contained the pathogen in their lower stem parts, as shown by immunofluorescence colony staining and PCR. The addition of pig slurry resulted in a significantly lower population size of R. solanacearum as well as reduced numbers of infected and (or) diseased plants in the soil suppressiveness tests. On the other hand, solarization of soil also decreased R. solanacearum survival but did not enhance soil suppressiveness as measured by development of disease symptoms and (or) plant invasion after 9 weeks. Combined soil solarization and pig slurry addition showed an additive effect of both treatments. Healthy-looking plants, primarily from soils treated with pig slurry and solarization, incidentally revealed the latent presence of R. solanacearum in the lower stem parts. The mechanism behind the enhanced population declines and disease suppressiveness induced by pig slurry is unclear but shifts in community profiles were clearly discernible by PCR - denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis 9 weeks after pig slurry addition in the field experiment, indicating induced changes in the bacterial community structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".