MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165282274 · doi:10.4043/19077-ms

First Jackup Drilling Operation on Grand Banks of Newfoundland-Lessons Learned

2007· article· en· W2165282274 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G.C. Bagnell, Peter J. Eng

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrillingOffshore drillingSubmarine pipelineDrillPetroleum engineeringGeologyMarine engineeringEngineeringMining engineeringOceanographyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fifty years after the first jackup drilled its first well for Standard Oil Company of Texas in the Gulf of Mexico, jackup drilling operations commenced for the first time in the treacherous sea conditions on the Grand Banks of Newfoundland. This paper addresses the risk management solutions, the boundary pushing technology, and the stakeholder cooperation that helped ensure jackup drilling operations on the Grand Banks could be performed without compromising safety and environmental protection. Recommendations are presented for continuing jackup activities in the region. Introduction The first well offshsore Newfoundland was spudded in 1966 utilizing a drillship. During the 1970's several drillships and semi-submersibles were active on the Grand Banks and the Labrador Shelf. The Hibernia discovery well was drilled in 1979 by a drillship and later that year a semi-submersible reentered the same well and conducted drill stem testing. Over 170 exploration-appraisal wells and 80 development wells have been drilled offshore Newfoundland all of which were drilled by either floating units or drilling installations mounted on a concrete platform. In 1996, the concept of jack-up drilling operations was proposed as an alternative way forward. The metocean operating conditions were determined to be within the capacity of new harsh environment jack-up designs. However, the iceberg and sea ice conditions on the Grand Banks required further deliberation. An ice statistical analysis and subsequently a risk assessment were conducted to quantify whether the proposed jackup concept was an acceptable one. The following rationale was then presented to the oil and gas community to promote jackup drilling operations as a feasible and desirable alternative.The jackup structure evolved quite substantially since drilling commenced offshore Newfoundland in the early 1970's.Non productive time in jackup drilling opertions is generally considered to be 10%-14% less than semisubmersible drilling operations.If one gives consideration to the anchor pattern of moored floating units during drilling operations, the footprint and hence an iceberg exclusion zone is approximately 10 times the area occupied by an elevated jackup.Jackup acceptance criteria have been standardized so as to guide industry and regulatory regimes with respect to site specific assessments.There is huge potential for mobilization and equipment certification cost savings by utilizing harsh environment jackups that are present in Atlantic Canada rather than importing floating drilling units from the international arena.The results of a risk assessment have ultimately demonstrated the feasibility of the jack-up drilling operation in the region. Upon completion of an independent study commissioned by Canada-Newfoundland regulatory authorities, an environmental impact study by an operator, the regulatory approval process for the drilling program, and a declaration that the ice free season had begun; a jackup was mobilized to Newfoundland waters to begin its first drilling operation on the Grand Banks. There were several lessons learned during the two years of seasonal jackup drilling activity in the region and the ultimate objective of this paper is to share those lessons with the oil and gas community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207