Antixenosis Resistance to <I>Oulema melanopus</I> (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Central Asian Wheat Germplasm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The cereal leaf beetle, Oulema melanopus (L.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), which is Eurasian in origin, is an emerging pest of agriculturally important cereal crops in western Canada, including wheat, oat, and barley. Among these crops, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has the highest number of resistant genotypes to O. melanopus infestation. Here we explored six genotypes from central Asia with putative resistance to the beetle in comparison with a widely grown Canadian wheat variety. We noted the highest oviposition on the susceptible control genotype, CDC GO, and the lowest on one of the central Asian genotypes (NN-100) in both choice and no-choice tests. Two of the other Asian genotypes (NN-78 and NN-105) were also less attractive for oviposition than the CDC GO check. Feeding trials also indicated less damage on some of the Asian genotypes (NN-100, NN-105, and NN-78) relative to CDC GO, but other Asian genotypes (NN-41, NN-45, and NN-27) were highly attractive for feeding and oviposition and did not exhibit stronger resistance to O. melanopus infestation than moderately resistant central Asian genotypes (NN-103, NN-78, or NN-105). There were no significant differences in the amount of feeding by overwintered and teneral adults. The results indicated that some wheat genotypes developed in central Asia have categories of nonpreference for feeding and oviposition worth considering in further development of host-plant resistance and integrated management of this pest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".