MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165344528 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2011.2123884

Multi-Camera Network Calibration with a Non-Planar Target

2011· article· en· W2165344528 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalibrationComputer visionPlanarCamera auto-calibrationArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceCamera resectioningSmart cameraOrientation (vector space)Image sensorComputer graphics (images)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid calibration of multi-camera systems using a planar target is typically impractical due to the difficulty of viewing the target in each camera simultaneously. To address these short-comings, a complete calibration methodology using a novel non-planar target for rapid calibration of inward-looking visual sensor networks (VSNs) is presented. We discuss the practical limitations of the approach, arising from an analysis of implementation issues when using spheres as calibration targets such as target-to-target and target-to-camera orientation relationships. This procedure is applied to fully calibrate (intrinsic and extrinsic camera parameters) a twelve camera inward-looking VSN, using only a single image per camera. Results from the calibration are compared for nominal and measured dimensions of the target.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it