La responsabilité du fait d'autrui des établissements envers les médecins: Avons-Nous atteint le point de bascule?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Par le passé, les médecins étaient seuls responsables des soins aux patients, tandis que les hôpitaux se contentaient de fournir le matériel et le personnel infirmier. Malgré d'importants changements à la relation entre le médecin et l'hôpital, les tribunaux canadiens maintiennent que les médecins sont des entrepreneurs indépendants. On explore si les propositions en vue de lier la rémunération au rendement, d'accroître la participation des conseils d'administration ou de la direction à l'attribution de privilèges et de partager la responsabilité de la qualité entre les médecins, les conseils d'administration et d'autres intervenants inciteront les tribunaux à transférer aux hôpitaux la responsabilité du fait d'autrui en cas de négligence de la part d'un médecin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".