Hybrid intelligent systems applied to the pursuit-evasion game
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new method of using hybrid intelligent systems to solve the problem of tuning the parameters of a fuzzy logic controller. Two different hybrid intelligent systems are introduced in this paper. Each system proposes learning in a two-stage iterative process. The first system combines a fuzzy logic controller with genetic algorithms to form the iterative genetic based fuzzy logic controller technique (IGBFLC). The second system combines a fuzzy logic controller with an adaptive network to form the iterative adaptive network fuzzy inference system (IANFIS). The proposed systems are applied to a model of pursuit-evasion game. In this model, we are seeking for the optimal strategy of the pursuer given that the evader plays its optimal strategy. The proposed systems are compared with the PD controller, the genetic-based fuzzy logic controller and the ANFIS technique. Computer simulations and results show that when compared to the optimal strategy, the proposed systems outperform the other techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it