MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2165401482 · doi:10.4141/cjps2013-336

Relating germination requirements of timber milkvetch to seral stage in the Interior Douglas-fir zone

2014· article· en· W2165401482 on OpenAlexaffvenue
D. J. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationSeral communityHorticultureBiologyDouglas firBotanyPopulationEcological succession

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thompson, D. J. 2014. Relating germination requirements of timber milkvetch to seral stage in the Interior Douglas-fir zone. Can. J. Plant Sci. 94: 723–726. Germination of timber milkvetch (Astragalus miser var. serotinus) seeds was studied to determine if it is an early or late seral species. Seeds were collected from a native plant population and those having a dark seed coat were selected. Germination tests were run in the light or dark and under three temperature regimes: low (constant 10°C), high (constant 25°C), and alternating (25°C day and 10°C night). Germination occurred over a protracted period with new germinants up to 90 d at the lowest temperature. Germination was not affected by light. Germination rate was greater at 25°C than 10°C, while fluctuating temperatures (25 and 10°C alternating every 12 h) reduced germination rate to that at the lower temperature. Days to 50% germination was a more sensitive indicator, with the mean for the fluctuating temperatures falling between those continuous to the high and low temperature. Final germination percentage was reduced at 10°C compared with 25°C, but not with fluctuating temperatures. Timber milkvetch seed germination did not respond to light or fluctuating temperatures, adding to a body of evidence that it is a late seral species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant Science→Same topicPlant and animal studies→French-language works237,207→