MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165410782 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v3n3p31

Photodegradation of m-cresol by Zinc Oxide under Visible-light Irradiation

2011· article· en· W2165410782 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodegradationChemistryPhotocatalysisIrradiationPhotochemistryAqueous solutionBenzoquinoneZincBenzaldehydeVisible spectrumNuclear chemistryCresolp-CresolSunlightCatalysisPhenolOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The photodegradation of m-cresol was carried out under visible light (46% sunlight) by ZnO as photocatalyst. To measure the efficiency of photodegradation, the different variables studied included amount of photocatalyst, concentration of m-cresol and pH. The maximum amount of photocatalyst and concentration of m-cresol was 1.5 g/L and 25 ppm respectively. The photodegradation was favorable in the pH 6-9 range. The detected intermediates were 2-methyl-1,4-benzodiol, 2-methyl-para-benzoquinone, 3,5-dihydroxytoluene and 2,5-dihydroxy-benzaldehyde. TOC studies show that 78% of total organic carbon is removed from solution during irradiation time. This study indicates the great potential of ZnO to remove aqueous m-cresol under visible-light irradiation which is part of sunlight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it