Inhibition of Spinal Prostaglandin Synthesis Early after L5/L6 Nerve Ligation Prevents the Development of Prostaglandin-dependent and Prostaglandin-independent Allodynia in the Rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostaglandins, synthesized in the spinal cord in response to noxious stimuli, are known to facilitate nociceptive transmission, raising questions about their role in neuropathic pain. The current study tested the hypothesis that spinal nerve ligation-induced allodynia is composed of an early prostaglandin-dependent phase, the disruption of which prevents allodynia. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats, fitted with intrathecal drug delivery or microdialysis catheters, underwent left L5-L6 spinal nerve ligation or sham surgery. Paw withdrawal threshold, brush-evoked behavior, and the concentration of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in spinal cerebrospinal fluid ([PGE2]dialysate) were determined for up to 24 days. PGE2-evoked glutamate release from spinal slices was also determined. RESULTS: Paw withdrawal threshold decreased from at least 15 g (control) to less than 4 g, beginning 1 day after ligation. Brushing the affected hind paw evoked nociceptive-like behavior and increased [PGE2]dialysate (up to 257 +/- 62% of baseline). There was no detectable change in basal [PGE2]dialysate from preligation values. The EC50 of PGE2-evoked glutamate release (2.4 x 10-11 M, control) was significantly decreased in affected spinal segments of allodynic rats (8.9 x 10-15 M). Treatment with intrathecal S(+)-ibuprofen or SC-560, beginning 2 h after ligation, prevented the decrease in paw withdrawal threshold, the brush-evoked increase in [PGE2]dialysate, and the change in EC50 of PGE2-evoked glutamate release. R(-)-ibuprofen or SC-236 had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide solid evidence that spinal prostaglandins, synthesized by cyclooxygenase-1 in the first 4-8 h after ligation, are critical in the pathogenesis of prostaglandin-dependent and prostaglandin-independent allodynia and that their early pharmacologic disruption affords protection against this neuropathic state in the rat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".