MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165431494 · doi:10.1300/j477v01n03_05

The Food Environment of Street Youth

2007· article· en· W2165431494 on OpenAlex
Anne-Marie Hamelin, Céline Mercier, Annie Bédard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood insecurityFood securityContext (archaeology)Healthy foodHealthy eatingPerceptionPsychologyYouth engagementAction (physics)Environmental healthPolitical scienceGeographyPhysical activityPublic relationsMedicineFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Satisfying dietary needs is one of the problems that street youth face each day. The goal of this study was to describe the food situation of a group of street youth living in precarious circumstances in Quebec City, Canada. Issues such as the context and nature of food perceptions of nutrition and food security were covered. Using an action-research approach, the study combined a visit to each youth's living space with a structured interview. The 25 youth who participated in this study do not live in an environment that is conducive to healthy eating or to the independent preparation of regular, full and varied meals. The lack of food and the compromised diet of street youth stand in stark contrast to their nutritional needs. This gap raises serious concerns about their physical and mental development as well as their social integration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it