Development and characterization of polypyrrole‐polylactide conductive open‐porous composites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, conductive porous composites were fabricated using the host substrate with an interconnected porous network, followed by the penetration and deposition of polypyrrole (PPy) to create a continuous conductive network. The open‐porous host substrate was processed using polylactide (PLA) with compression molding and salt leaching techniques. Three different salt contents were varied from 75 wt %, 85 wt %, and 90 wt %, which were referred to by their salt‐to‐polymer mass ratios of 3, 6, and 9, respectively. The porous network was made conductive by coating its interior surfaces through in situ polymerization of PPy using iron (III) chloride as the oxidant species. These porous composites were then characterized to analyze the relationships between their morphology and their physical, conductive, and mechanical properties. The mechanical properties were then fitted with numerically simulated results from finite element modeling (FEM). © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".