MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165485672 · doi:10.1109/tsmca.2010.2052602

Improving Mouse Dynamics Biometric Performance Using Variance Reduction via Extractors With Separate Features

2010· article· en· W2165485672 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUser Authentication and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiometricsComputer scienceMerge (version control)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceData miningMultivariate statisticsVariance (accounting)Fuzzy logicMachine learningInformation retrieval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The European standard for access control imposes stringent performance requirements on commercial biometric technologies that few existing recognition systems are able to meet. In this correspondence paper, we present the first mouse dynamics biometric recognition system that fulfills this standard. The proposed system achieves notable performance improvement by developing separate models for separate feature groups involved. The improvements are achieved through the use of a fuzzy classification based on the Learning Algorithm for Multivariate Data Analysis and using a score-level fusion scheme to merge corresponding biometric scores. Evaluation of the proposed framework using mouse data from 48 users achieves a false acceptance rate of 0% and a false rejection rate of 0.36%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it