Emotional Intelligence in Modifying Social and Academic Adjustment among First Year University Students in North Jordan
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study examines the influence of emotional intelligence training in increasing social and academicadjustment among first year university students in North Jordan. A total number of 289 first year universitystudents who were randomly selected from the two universities in North Jordan comprised both the experimentaland control group. The results of the study indicate significant mean differences between the two groups havingemotional intelligence as a variable. Additionally, the results indicate no significant differences betweenexperimental and control group on social and academic adjustment variables. Supported by no significant meandifference according to gender between participants but the results indicate significant mean differencesaccording to age between them. Although the descriptive statistics results show no significant differences asexpected; the experimental group is revealed to be more effective with participants in all the research variables.Therefore, it is recommended that emotional intelligence training should be utilized as adjunct strategy inenhancing student social and academic adjustment among adolescents and adult students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it