MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165517280 · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1619113

Pharmakogenetik bei juveniler idiopathischer Arthritis

2014· article· de· W2165517280 on OpenAlexaff
Heinrike Schmeling

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis und Rheuma · 2014
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Bone and Joint Health InstituteAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zusammenfassung Die juvenile idiopathische Arthritis (JIA) ist die häufigste chronische rheumatische Erkrankung im Kindesalter. Viele Kinder benötigen nach Diagnosestellung über viele Jahre immunmodulierende Therapien. Ein beträchtlicher Anteil von Kindern zeigt schwere therapierefraktäre Verläufe und einige entwickeln schwerwiegende Medikamentennebenwirkungen. Zahlreiche Genpolymorphismen wurden als potenzielle prädiktive Biomarker in klinischen Studien zur Pharmako genetik von Methotrexat und Etanercept bei der JIA analysiert, ohne jedoch eindeutige Ergebnisse erbracht zu haben. Dies ist möglicherweise auf kleine und klinisch heterogene Studienpopulationen, Unterschiede in der Bewertung der Krankheitsaktivität und der Analyse von nur wenigen Kandidatengenvarianten zurückzuführen. Die erste pharmakogenetische genomweite Untersuchung bei der JIA hat Genregionen von besonderem biologischen Interesse identifiziert. Eine Validierung ist jedoch erforderlich. Die Entdeckung neuer pharmakogenetischer Biomarker und deren Netzwerke können zur Entwicklung neuer Medikamente führen und eine „individuelle“ Therapie ermöglichen, die das Nutzen-Risiko-Verhältnis einer Therapie für den einzelnen JIA-Patienten verbessert.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis und RheumaSame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207