MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165551378 · doi:10.1136/jmg.2004.019901

<i>SALL4</i> deletions are a common cause of Okihiro and acro-renal-ocular syndromes and confirm haploinsufficiency as the pathogenic mechanism

2004· article· en· W2165551378 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Wiktor Borozdin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Genetics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsFrameshift mutationHaploinsufficiencyNonsenseGeneticsNonsense mutationMedicinePenetranceMissense mutationMutationBiologyPhenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

23 and mutations at SALL4 have been shown to be causative in patients with Okihiro/Duane-radial ray syn- drome (OMIM No 607323). 45 SALL2 6 and SALL3 7 have not yet been associated with human disease. We previously reported frameshift and nonsense mutations in SALL4 in five of eight families segregating the Okihiro syndrome phenotype. 5 A further report 4 identified two frameshift mutations and one nonsense mutation in three affected kindreds, including the family reported by Okihiro et al. 8 In a recent study of patients with the clinical diagnosis of Holt-Oram syndrome (OMIM No 142900), one additional frameshift mutation was reported from a family which turned out to have Okihiro syndrome rather than Holt-Oram syndrome. 9 Furthermore, we reported three novel and one already identified SALL4 mutations in patients originally diagnosed as either Holt-Oram syndrome (later revised as Okihiro syndrome on the basis of the observation of a Duane anomaly in at least one of the affected family members in each family), acro-renal-ocular syndrome (OMIM No 102490), and Holt-Oram syndrome versus thalidomide embryopathy. 10

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical GeneticsSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207