MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165618904 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1998.685542

Bilateral transactions considered as interconnections in a deregulated environment

2002· article· en· W2165618904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectricity Theft Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDatabase transactionDeregulationComputer scienceTransaction processingElectricityIndustrial organizationTransaction costComputer securityElectricity marketCompensating transactionRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessOnline transaction processingDatabaseFinanceEconomicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under deregulation, the electricity market will generate numerous bilateral transactions between the buying and selling entities. In this paper, all bilateral transactions are treated as a form of interconnections so that the classical methodology can be applied to study the feasibility of any proposed transaction on the basis of system security and the existence of other simultaneous bilateral transactions. Indices are developed to quantify the probability of success of any proposed bilateral transaction, referenced to as POST-the Probability of Secure Transaction. These values of POST are suitable to be integrated into the technical and economic evaluation of a proposed transaction to determine its feasibility and justify its implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectricity Theft Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207