MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165646489 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2005.862067

Multidimensional vector radix FHT algorithms

2006· article· en· W2165646489 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmFast Fourier transformComputer scienceDiscrete Fourier transform (general)DecimationDiscrete Hartley transformDimension (graph theory)Hartley transformTwiddle factorSoftwareImplementationComputationMathematicsFourier transformFilter (signal processing)Fourier analysisFractional Fourier transform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, efficient multidimensional (M-D) vector radix (VR) decimation-in-frequency and decimation-in-time fast Hartley transform (FHT) algorithms are derived for computing the discrete Hartley transform (DHT) of any dimension using an appropriate index mapping and the Kronecker product. The proposed algorithms are more effective and highly suitable for hardware and software implementations compared to all existing M-D FHT algorithms that are derived for the computation of the DHT of any dimension. The butterflies of the proposed algorithms are based on simple closed-form expressions that allow easy implementations of these algorithms for any dimension. In addition, the proposed algorithms possess properties such as high regularity, simplicity and in-place computation that are highly desirable for software and hardware implementations, especially for the M-D applications. A close relationship between the M-D VR complex-valued fast Fourier transform algorithms and the proposed M-D VR FHT algorithms is established. This type of relationship is of great significance for software and hardware implementations of the algorithms, since it is shown that because of this relationship and the fact that the DHT is an alternative to the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) for real data, a single module with a little or no modification can be used to carry out the forward and inverse M-D DFTs for real- or complex-valued data and M-D DHTs. Thus, the same module (with a little or no modification) can be used to cover all domains of applications that involve the DFTs or DHTs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it