MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165646489 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2005.862067

Multidimensional vector radix FHT algorithms

2006· article· en· W2165646489 on OpenAlexaff
Saad Bouguezel, M.N.S. Swamy, M.O. Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmFast Fourier transformComputer scienceDiscrete Fourier transform (general)DecimationDiscrete Hartley transformDimension (graph theory)Hartley transformTwiddle factorSoftwareImplementationComputationMathematicsFourier transformFilter (signal processing)Fourier analysisFractional Fourier transform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, efficient multidimensional (M-D) vector radix (VR) decimation-in-frequency and decimation-in-time fast Hartley transform (FHT) algorithms are derived for computing the discrete Hartley transform (DHT) of any dimension using an appropriate index mapping and the Kronecker product. The proposed algorithms are more effective and highly suitable for hardware and software implementations compared to all existing M-D FHT algorithms that are derived for the computation of the DHT of any dimension. The butterflies of the proposed algorithms are based on simple closed-form expressions that allow easy implementations of these algorithms for any dimension. In addition, the proposed algorithms possess properties such as high regularity, simplicity and in-place computation that are highly desirable for software and hardware implementations, especially for the M-D applications. A close relationship between the M-D VR complex-valued fast Fourier transform algorithms and the proposed M-D VR FHT algorithms is established. This type of relationship is of great significance for software and hardware implementations of the algorithms, since it is shown that because of this relationship and the fact that the DHT is an alternative to the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) for real data, a single module with a little or no modification can be used to carry out the forward and inverse M-D DFTs for real- or complex-valued data and M-D DHTs. Thus, the same module (with a little or no modification) can be used to cover all domains of applications that involve the DFTs or DHTs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and ApplicationsSame topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207