MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165656751

Pathologists going "live": lessons from a developing country on giving a human face to pathology.

2003· article· en· W2165656751 on OpenAlexaff
Ken Obenson

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Health and Surgery
Canadian institutionsSaint John Regional Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFace (sociological concept)Perspective (graphical)Developing countryHuman PathologyMedicineMedical educationPathologyComputer scienceEconomic growthSociologySocial scienceArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1998, I signed up for a 2-year commitment with the United Nations Volunteers, a division of the United Nations Development Program, seeking excitement and a different perspective on pathology practice. Fresh out of fellowship, I looked forward to the challenges of working in a region short on

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0220.025
Scholarly communication0.0150.020
Open science0.0040.019
Research integrity0.0200.040
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicGlobal Health and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207