Time-domain front-end for short time windowing UWB WLAN transform-domain receiver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the selectivity problem, for the ultra-wide band (UWB), transform-domain receiver loss of orthogonality. A novel selective time-domain direct-sequence front-end for transform-domain ultra-wideband (UWB) wireless local area network (WLAN) receiver is proposed. The architecture comprises a multi-block, linear, dynamic feedback low-noise amplifier (LNA), quadrature mixer, and baseband filter. The dynamic feedback with inductive output load reduces the LNA to a simple second-order filter, with zero at the origin, while improving the conversion gain (CG) and noise figure (NF). Thus, the CG is further maximized when limiting the two poles within the 5-6 GHz frequency band. The mixer, based on a merged quadrature topology, employs single-peak notch network, with benefits to the NF and IIP3 of CG at 5.6 GHz. The front-end dissipates a 19.6 mW from 1.8 V supply voltage and achieves at 5.6 GHz 34.8 dB conversion gain, 6.42 dB NF, and 1-dB gain desensitization with -8 dBm interferer power at 7 GHz. Other simulation results are -2.35 dBm minimum IIIP3, and -35 dBc rejection at the UWB group #3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".