Capturing Local Variability for Speaker Normalization in Speech Recognition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The new model reduces the impact of local spectral and temporal variability by estimating a finite set of spectral and temporal warping factors which are applied to speech at the frame level. Optimum warping factors are obtained while decoding in a locally constrained search. The model involves augmenting the states of a standard hidden Markov model (HMM), providing an additional degree of freedom. It is argued in this paper that this represents an efficient and effective method for compensating local variability in speech which may have potential application to a broader array of speech transformations. The technique is presented in the context of existing methods for frequency warping-based speaker normalization for ASR. The new model is evaluated in clean and noisy task domains using subsets of the Aurora 2, the Spanish Speech-Dat-Car, and the TIDIGITS corpora. In addition, some experiments are performed on a Spanish language corpus collected from a population of speakers with a range of speech disorders. It has been found that, under clean or not severely degraded conditions, the new model provides improvements over the standard HMM baseline. It is argued that the framework of local warping is an effective general approach to providing more flexible models of speaker variability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it