Highly Efficient and Robust Blue Phosphorescent Pt(II) Compounds with a Phenyl‐1,2,3‐triazolyl and a Pyridyl‐1,2,4‐triazolyl Chelate Core
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new class of brightly phosphorescent Pt(II) compounds that contain an N∧C‐chelate phenyl‐1,2,3‐triazolyl ligand (ptrz) and an N∧C‐chelate pyridyl‐1,2,4‐triazolyl ligand (pytrz) in the central core is achieved. The impact of various substituent groups on phosphorescence of this class of molecules is examined. Crystal structural analyses revealed that this class of compounds has a great tendency to form stacked dimers—one of which is persistent even in the gas phase—leading to excimer emission. The introduction of bulky substituents, such as diphenyl amino (NPh2) or trityl (CPh3), is found to greatly diminish the excimer emission. Using this approach, several highly efficient blue and green phosphorescent Pt(II) compounds with λem at ≈450–460 nm and Φp ≈ 0.70 to 1.00 are obtained. These molecules are highly robust with exceptionally high thermal stability. Bright bluish‐green electrophosphorescent devices with external quantum efficiencies as high as 16.7% are fabricated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".