MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165745588 · doi:10.1093/humrep/del104

Reply: Possibility of hidden damages with temporary uterine artery occlusion device

2006· article· en· W2165745588 on OpenAlexaff
George A. Vilos, E.C. Vilos, Walter Romano, Basim Abu‐Rafea

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDamagesUterine arteryMedicineOcclusionSurgeryPregnancyBiologyPolitical scienceLawGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir, Dr Palacios Jaraquemada raises concerns of ureteric and ovary damage following the treatment of women with symptomatic fibroids with temporary, Doppler-directed, transvaginal uterine artery occlusion with the flostat system (Vilos et al. 2006). At this stage in the system’s development, we have limited knowledge about the risks of either ureteric or ovarian damage. We are, however, pleased to share what we do know. From development work completed before the two pilot trials we have performed, it is known that the flostat clamp does not come into contact or apply pressure to the pelvic ureter. During direct laparoscopic observation, it was seen that the pelvic ureters are lateral to the closed clamp (Lichtinger et al., 2005). The flostat clamp is a vascular clamp that exerts closing pressures in the range of pressures exerted by other Food and Drug Agency (FDA) cleared vascular clamps. It is not a tissue-crushing clamp. When closed, the flostat clamp folds vaginal tissue and the uterine arteries against the lateral walls of the uterus. When the bladder is empty, tissue in the trigone of the bladder could be distorted as the vaginal and vascular tissue is folded. To mitigate this possibility, we now apply the flostat clamp only with the urinary bladder full. Bilaterally occluding the uterine arteries at the level of their junction with the lateral walls of the isthmus does not entirely stop blood flow to the uterus from the uterine arteries. When temporary, transvaginal uterine artery occlusion is performed with the flostat clamp, small, unnamed arteries within the broad ligament immediately dilate proximal to the clamp and supply a trickle of flow to the ascending branch of the uterine artery. With this degree of ischaemia, no woman whom we have treated has experienced amenorrhoea, and most women treated have had relief from their fibroid related symptoms. Although we agree that amenorrhoea may be seen as we treat more and more women in the future, we do not believe that the frequency of ovarian damage will be anywhere near the 10% range suggested by Palacios Jaraquemada. Our belief rest upon the following observations. Women have two ovaries, not one. To render a woman amenorrhoeic following uterine artery occlusion, both ovaries would have to be damaged. Harming one ovary, although undesirable, is not the same as harming two. For a woman wanting to bear a child, harming both ovaries would be a tragedy. In most women, each ovary has a dual, or redundant, arterial blood supply. Most ovaries receive blood from an ipsilateral ovarian artery and from a communicating artery that connects with the ascending branch of the ipsilateral uterine artery (Binkert et al., 2001). Palacios Jaraquemada is concerned about women with vascular anatomy variants who have both ovaries supplied exclusively or ‘mainly’ by their uterine arteries. Vascular anatomy variations are random events that occur during embryology. In general, they are not correlated with one another and the probability of observing two vascular anatomy variations in the same women is less than 5% (Razavi et al., 2004). Although the unilateral arterial supply of one ovary from its ipsilateral uterine artery has been described at a frequency between 4 and 6.6%, no article in the world’s medical literature has ever described both ovaries being primarily supplied by its ipsilateral uterine artery. It is, therefore, only a theoretical possibility that such an event can occur, at all. And if it does occur, the probability of this event is less than half the number proposed by Palacios Jaraquemada, somewhere between 1.6 and 4.4% (Razavi et al., 2002). Consequently, though an interesting theoretical concern, we cannot find data to support Palacios Jaraquemada statement that ‘in approximately 10% of cases, the ovary circulation depends mainly on the uterine artery’, nor can we find a single published case example of a woman whose ovaries are bilaterally ‘mainly’ dependent on circulation from the uterine arteries. It is now well established that a woman can become amenorrhoeic following uterine artery embolization (UAE). However, UAE is an entirely different procedure than temporary, transvaginal uterine artery occlusion with the flostat system. During UAE, permanent, flow-directed particles form clot in arteries, wherever the particles ultimately land. Because communicating arteries connect the ascending branch of the uterine artery with the ovarian circulation, UAE particles can and do reach the ovaries. Pathology studies have demonstrated UAE particles in and around the ovaries following UAE (Payne et al., 2002). Despite these pathological findings, the frequency of ovarian failure following UAE in women below the age of menopause is much less than the 10% predicted by Palacios Jaraquemada. Pron et al. (2003) tabulated the frequency of cessation of menstruation following UAE by age. In women 44 years and younger, 5 of 305 (1.6%) ceased menstruating following UAE. In peri-menopausal women (women 50 years and older), the frequency of amenorrhoea following UAE was much higher, 26%. The average age of menopause in the United States is 51.4 years. Others have confirmed the findings of Pron et al. (2003) in younger women. Tropeano et al. (2004) measured day 3 FSH levels, ovarian volumes and follicle numbers in 20 normally cycling women aged 33–39 prior to and at 3, 6 and 12 months following UAE. UAE had no short- or mid-term effects on ovarian reserve. This information, taken together, leads us to predict that following transvaginal uterine artery occlusion, some younger women may be at risk of amenorrhoea, but the risk would be small, in the 1% range, not the 10% range as suggested by Palacios Jaraquemada. We thank Palacios Jaraquemada for his interest in our work and for his thoughtful opinions. We anticipate that as further clinical studies are performed, clinical data will accumulate to address his concerns, more directly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman ReproductionSame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207