Texture Analysis for Automatic Segmentation of Intervertebral Disks of Scoliotic Spines From MR Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a unified framework for automatic segmentation of intervertebral disks of scoliotic spines from different types of magnetic resonance (MR) image sequences. The method exploits a combination of statistical and spectral texture features to discriminate closed regions representing intervertebral disks from background in MR images of the spine. Specific texture features are evaluated for three types of MR sequences acquired in the sagittal plane: 2-D spin echo, 3-D multiecho data image combination, and 3-D fast imaging with steady state precession. A total of 22 texture features (18 statistical and 4 spectral) are extracted from every closed region obtained from an automatic segmentation procedure based on the watershed approach. The feature selection step based on principal component analysis and clustering process permit to decide among all the extracted features which ones resulted in the highest rate of good classification. The proposed method is validated using a supervised k-nearest-neighbor classifier on 505 MR images coming from three different scoliotic patients and three different MR acquisition protocols. Results suggest that the selected texture features and classification can contribute to solve the problem of oversegmentation inherent to existing automatic segmentation methods by successfully discriminating intervertebral disks from the background on MRI of scoliotic spines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".