MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165761400 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3851

INSTRUMENTED BALL DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

2011· article· en· W2165761400 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Suda Martins, Wei Li, Peter Radziszewski

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComminutionBall (mathematics)Ball millKinematicsMillBall screwMechanical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceSimulationMathematicsPhysicsMaterials scienceClassical mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the mineral processing industry, tumbling mills are used in the size reduction or comminution of ore to a target size distribution. As the tumbling mill environment is quite violent it is difficult to monitor mill charge motion let alone single ball or particle motion. An effort was initiated to investigate the development of an instrumented ball that includes data collection capabilities. A variety of sensors, including accelerometers and gyros, form the instrument package. The data collected by the instruments allow the calculation of a number of dynamic and kinematic quantities as a function of time. Using instrumented ball data, the error model of the instrument can be found. Finally, the importance of the data with respect to ball mills is discussed along with the relationship between the instrumented ball data and charge motion simulation results is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207