MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165764266 · doi:10.1002/jmv.2080

Quantitative study of the infection in brain neurons in human rabies

2001· article· en· W2165764266 on OpenAlexaff
Alan C. Jackson, Hongtao Ye, Cecilia Ridaura‐Sanz, Eduardo López‐Corella

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Virology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicRabies epidemiology and control
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRabiesRabies virusVirologyImmunoperoxidaseVirusBiologyAntigenStainingNeurotropic virusImmunologyAntibodyMonoclonal antibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rabies virus is a highly neuronotropic virus that causes encephalomyelitis. Rabies virus infection was studied in neurons in the brain of an 8-year-old girl that died of rabies in Mexico. The extent of the neuronal infection was evaluated quantitatively in neuronal cell types of the brain using histologic staining for Negri bodies and immunoperoxidase staining for rabies virus antigen in the same neurons. Quantitative image analysis was used to compare the amount of infection in five different neuronal cell types, which was expressed as a percentage of neuronal area. Purkinje cells and periaqueductal gray neurons showed the largest percentage area for both Negri bodies and signal for rabies virus antigen. In general, there was a good linear relationship between the area of Negri bodies and the area of signal for rabies virus antigen. Many neurons with rabies virus antigen did not have Negri bodies, however, and some neurons with large antigen signals, especially Purkinje cells and periaqueductal gray neurons, lacked Negri bodies. Formation of Negri bodies is likely influenced by factors that vary in different neuronal cell types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical VirologySame topicRabies epidemiology and controlFrench-language works237,207