MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reflections on the Implementation of the FOS for the Benefit of Students Majored in French

2012· article· en· W2165769329 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shuyan Wang, Zhang Qinglu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversity (politics)GlobalizationAP French LanguageForeign languageKey (lock)PedagogyFrenchChinese languageSociologyLinguisticsPolitical scienceComputer sciencePhilosophyLawAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The teaching of FOS (French for specific objectives) in Chinese universities is the result of the development of Sino-French exchanges, bridges the gap between the French language and the business and facilitates the access to the professional world for the students majored in French. It reflects the thoughts of the French teachers on the renewal of the French language teaching towards the diversity of pedagogical and didactic approaches at the age of globalization. Key words: FLE (French as a foreign language); FOS (French for specific objectives); Pedagogical and didactic diversity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0080.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicSecond Language Learning and TeachingFrench-language works237,207