Pattern recognition based detection and localization in a network of randomly distributed sensor nodes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper extends the analysis of a statistical methodology for source detection and localization (SDL) in a network of randomly distributed wireless nodes equipped with homogeneous and omni-directional sensors. The investigations are focused on SDL with respect to the nearest sensor node and are based on the observed source (phenomenon) energy. In this framework, the SDL algorithms are viewed as classification problems which are solved using pattern recognition techniques. In the presented approach: (i) sensors are randomly distributed and little is known about their exact locations; and (ii) a self-calibrating mechanism is proposed for creating the dataset whose feature vectors constitute the reference points for sensor locations in the space of sensor readings. The performance of the proposed algorithms is evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations and is demonstrated to be robust in the presence of noise and changes in the propagation environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it