MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165853389 · doi:10.3955/0029-344x-81.4.305

Diversity and Distribution of Oribatid Mites (Acari: Oribatida) Associated with Arboreal and Terrestrial Habitats in Interior Cedar-Hemlock Forests, British Columbia, Canada

2007· article· en· W2165853389 on OpenAlex
Zoë Lindo, Susan K. Stevenson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueNorthwest Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicStudy of Mite Species
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOribatidaLichenEcologyForest floorBiologySpecies richnessCanopyTsugaArboreal locomotionAbundance (ecology)EpiphyteLitterHabitatPlant litterMiteCoarse woody debrisEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We assessed oribatid mite abundance, species richness and community composition in arboreal and terrestrial habitats associated with 12 western redcedar trees in the Interior Cedar-Hemlock biogeoclimactic zone of British Columbia, Canada. We extracted microarthropods from 36 canopy litter samples, 36 epiphytic lichen samples from three different lichen functional groups, and 36 soil core samples of the forest floor litter layer. Oribatid mites dominated microarthropod assemblages in all habitats. Total microarthropod and oribatid mite abundances were significantly greater in forest floors and foliose (leaf-like) lichens compared to canopy litter accumulations, and alectorioid (hair-like) and cyanolichen (lobed) groups. Sixty-one species of oribatid mites were identified from the study area. The ten species collected from canopy litter and 14 species collected from epiphytic lichens shared five species in common, whereas only three of the 45 species collected from the forest floor also were found within the canopy system. Principal components analysis and discriminant function analysis differentiated three distinct assemblages of oribatid mites corresponding to the canopy litter accumulations, epiphytic lichens and forest floor habitats. Low abundance of oribatid mites in canopy litter accumulations is attributed to low microhabitat structural complexity, low food resources and low desiccation resistance in these habitats compared to canopy lichen habitats and the forest floor. Epiphytic lichens are the dominant habitat for arboreal oribatid mites in the ICH forest zone, and contribute to the overall biodiversity of the forest system by containing distinct oribatid mite assemblages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.724

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it