MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165931417 · doi:10.1109/pacrim.1991.160778

Development of a VQ-HMM continuous speech speaker-independent recognition system for small vocabularies

2002· article· en· W2165931417 on OpenAlexafffund
Edgar F. Velez, L. Cossette, V. Cuperman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHidden Markov modelSpeech recognitionComputer scienceVector quantizationViterbi algorithmVocabularySpeaker recognitionArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Linguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors describe the first phase in the development of a speech recognition system for small vocabularies. The system is designed to handle speaker-independent continuous speech and can be easily modified for different vocabularies. The system consists of a spectral analysis stage followed by vector quantization (VQ) and hidden Markov modeling (HMM). VQ is performed by multiple acoustic parameter codebooks, which are independent or dependent on speech units. The approach seeks to incorporate more knowledge about phoneme allophonic, linguistic, and speaker-dependent variations. The increase in number of codebooks is compensated by their decrease in size, minimizing effects on storage requirements. Phoneme HMM models permit an easy adaptation to new vocabulary requirements. A loop HMM structure with optional silences between words allows continuous speech recognition using a Viterbi search. Preliminary experiments on continuous phoneme and digit recognition were performed on an unrestricted-speaker telephone database.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207