MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165932211 · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.84.2.1050

Cornea-Responsive Medullary Dorsal Horn Neurons: Modulation by Local Opioids and Projections to Thalamus and Brain Stem

2000· article· en· W2165932211 on OpenAlexaff
Harumitsu Hirata, Shinichiro Takeshita, James W. Hu, David A. Bereiter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurophysiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
KeywordsDAMGOChemistryMicroinjectionEnkephalinAgonistSpinal cordMorphineThalamusEndocrinologyInternal medicineμ-opioid receptorCentral nervous systemOpioid receptorOpioidReceptorNeuroscienceMedicineBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previously, it was determined that microinjection of morphine into the caudal portion of subnucleus caudalis mimicked the facilitatory effects of intravenous morphine on cornea-responsive neurons recorded at the subnucleus interpolaris/caudalis (Vi/Vc) transition region. The aim of the present study was to determine the opioid receptor subtype(s) that mediate modulation of corneal units and to determine whether opioid drugs affected unique classes of units. Pulses of CO(2) gas applied to the cornea were used to excite neurons at the Vi/Vc ("rostral" neurons) and the caudalis/upper cervical spinal cord transition region (Vc/C1, "caudal" neurons) in barbiturate-anesthetized male rats. Microinjection of morphine sulfate (2.9-4.8 nmol) or the selective mu receptor agonist D-Ala, N-Me-Phe, Gly-ol-enkephalin (DAMGO; 1.8-15.0 pmol) into the caudal transition region enhanced the response in 7 of 27 (26%) rostral units to CO(2) pulses and depressed that of 10 units (37%). Microinjection of a selective delta ([D-Pen(2,5)] (DPDPE); 24-30 pmol) or kappa receptor agonist (U50488; 1.8-30.0 pmol) into the caudal transition region did not affect the CO(2)-evoked responses of rostral units. Caudal units were inhibited by local DAMGO or DPDPE but were not affected by U50,488H. The effects of DAMGO and DPDPE were reversed by naloxone (0.2 mg/kg iv). Intravenous morphine altered the CO(2)-evoked activity in a direction opposite to that of local DAMGO in 3 of 15 units, in the same direction as local DAMGO but with greater magnitude in 4 units, and in the same direction with equal magnitude as local DAMGO in 8 units. CO(2)-responsive rostral and caudal units projected to either the thalamic posterior nucleus/zona incerta region (PO/ZI) or the superior salivatory/facial nucleus region (SSN/VII). However, rostral units not responsive to CO(2) pulses projected only to SSN/VII and caudal units not responsive to CO(2) projected only to PO/ZI. It was concluded that the circuitry for opioid analgesia in corneal pain involves multiple sites of action: inhibition of neurons at the caudal transition region, by intersubnuclear connections to modulate rostral units, and by supraspinal sites. Local administration of opioid agonists modulated all classes of corneal units. Corneal stimulus modality was predictive of efferent projection status for rostral and caudal units to sensory thalamus and reflex areas of the brain stem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurophysiologySame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207