MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165975095

Alternative control solutions for vehicles with continuously variable transmission. A case study

2011· article· en· W2165975095 on OpenAlex
Claudia‐Adina Bojan‐Dragos, Ștefan Preitl, Radu‐Emil Precup, Emil M. Petriu, Mircea‐Bogdan Rădac, Alexandra-Iulia Szedlak-Stinean

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Parametric statisticsController (irrigation)PID controllerSPARK (programming language)Fuzzy control systemSensitivity (control systems)Computer scienceControl engineeringControl systemTransmission (telecommunications)Fuzzy logicEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsTemperature control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper employs the sensitivity analysis with respect to the parametric variations of the controlled plant in the low-cost controller designs for a vehicle power train systems with spark-ignition engine and continuously variable transmission. The three control solutions suggested in order to ensure the asymptotic speed tracking include a PI controller, a PID controller and a one-degree-of-freedom Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy controller. The digital simulation results prove that the low-cost control solutions ensure good control system performance with respect to the modifications of the reference input and to a category of parametric disturbances caused by the modifications of the vehicle's mass. A comparison between the control solutions is offered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it