MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165984694 · doi:10.1080/15551024.2013.825953

The Self in Context and Culture

2013· article· en· W2165984694 on OpenAlexaff
Roger Frie

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSocial Representations and Identity
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociocultural evolutionInterpretation (philosophy)Set (abstract data type)IllusionEpistemologySelfSociologyPsychologySocial psychologyContext (archaeology)Cultural psychologyEveryday lifeCognitive psychologyAnthropologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The notion of the self is not so much an illusion as it is a “cultural construction.” The self refers to a set of implicit cultural values that we adhere to and use to guide our lives. These values are reflections of specific sociocultural practices in which we exist and that we learn in everyday interaction from the earliest age. These values not only inform our development, they provide the practice of psychoanalysis and psychology with a set of norms about what human life should ideally look like. As with other central concepts, the notion of the self is a product of a specific time and place. It is a culturally specific term, and refers to a set of norms and assumptions about our contemporary life. I conclude that the notion of the self forms an intractable part of Western, and particularly Anglo-American, culture and is produced by a particular kind of social and cultural practice that is specific to time and place. The self is one interpretation of being human among others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.040
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Psychoanalytic Self PsychologySame topicSocial Representations and IdentityFrench-language works237,207