MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166058418 · doi:10.1130/b25228.1

Controls on caldera structure: Results from analogue sandbox modeling

2004· article· en· W2166058418 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ben Kennedy, John Stix, James W. Vallance, Yan Lavallée, Marc‐Antoine Longpré

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersUniversité du Québec à MontréalNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLibrary scienceSandbox (software development)Art historyComputer scienceHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| May 01, 2004 Controls on caldera structure: Results from analogue sandbox modeling Ben Kennedy; Ben Kennedy 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John Stix; John Stix 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar James W. Vallance; James W. Vallance 2Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Yan Lavallée; Yan Lavallée 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Marc-Antoine Longpré Marc-Antoine Longpré 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Ben Kennedy 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada John Stix 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada James W. Vallance 2Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6, Canada Yan Lavallée 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada Marc-Antoine Longpré 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 01 Aug 2002 Revision Received: 30 Jan 2003 Accepted: 20 Jul 2003 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2004) 116 (5-6): 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1130/B25228.1 Article history Received: 01 Aug 2002 Revision Received: 30 Jan 2003 Accepted: 20 Jul 2003 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Ben Kennedy, John Stix, James W. Vallance, Yan Lavallée, Marc-Antoine Longpré; Controls on caldera structure: Results from analogue sandbox modeling. GSA Bulletin 2004;; 116 (5-6): 515–524. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B25228.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract We conducted scaled analogue sandbox models of caldera formation in order to understand the effects of chamber depth and orientation on the spatial and temporal development of calderas. Dry sand contained in a 1-m-diameter cylinder served as a crustal rock analogue, and a water-filled 0.6-m-diameter rubber bladder served as an analogue magma chamber. Scaling parameters included a length ratio (L*) of 2.5 × 10–5 and a stress ratio (σ*) of 1.8–2.4 × 10–5. In contrast to some previous analogue models, the viscosity of the fluid in the chamber and its withdrawal rate were properly scaled. Generally, deformation began with broad sagging, followed by an arcuate or linear outward-dipping fault that formed on one side of the caldera. This fault propagated laterally around the caldera in both directions, sometimes joining other faults, and typically forming an overall polygonal structure. As subsidence continued, the caldera grew incrementally outward and progressively formed a series of concentric outward-dipping faults. Lastly, a peripheral zone of extension and pronounced sagging, and commonly an inward- dipping outer fault related to extension, developed at the surface. As the depth of the chamber increased, (1) the area of faulting decreased, (2) the symmetry of the caldera was affected, and (3) the coherence of the subsiding block decreased. Tilting the chamber caused highly asymmetric subsidence to occur. In this case, faults formed first where the bladder was shallowest. Subsidence then shifted rapidly to where the bladder was deepest, producing an elongate trapdoor caldera that was deepest where the bladder was deepest. Our experiments highlight the roles of sagging and faulting during caldera subsidence. Surface fault patterns both in our experiments and at natural calderas are frequently not circular. The aspect ratio of the block above the magma chamber controls the shape of the caldera, which is frequently polygonal. The faults at natural calderas determine locations and migration of eruptive vents, the degree of subsidence, the style of postcal dera resurgent magmatism, and the extent of hydrothermal circulation. Our experiments reveal details of how calderas grow outward incrementally and demonstrate that asymmetric subsidence along linear and arcuate faults is common to many calderas. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207