MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2166058418 · doi:10.1130/b25228.1

Controls on caldera structure: Results from analogue sandbox modeling

2004· article· en· W2166058418 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Ben Kennedy, John Stix, James W. Vallance, Yan Lavallée, Marc‐Antoine Longpré

Notice bibliographique

RevueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
Thématiqueearthquake and tectonic studies
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesUniversité du Québec à MontréalNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill UniversityNational Science Foundation
Mots-clésLibrary scienceSandbox (software development)Art historyComputer scienceHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Research Article| May 01, 2004 Controls on caldera structure: Results from analogue sandbox modeling Ben Kennedy; Ben Kennedy 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John Stix; John Stix 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar James W. Vallance; James W. Vallance 2Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Yan Lavallée; Yan Lavallée 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Marc-Antoine Longpré Marc-Antoine Longpré 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Ben Kennedy 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada John Stix 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada James W. Vallance 2Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6, Canada Yan Lavallée 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada Marc-Antoine Longpré 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 01 Aug 2002 Revision Received: 30 Jan 2003 Accepted: 20 Jul 2003 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2004) 116 (5-6): 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1130/B25228.1 Article history Received: 01 Aug 2002 Revision Received: 30 Jan 2003 Accepted: 20 Jul 2003 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Ben Kennedy, John Stix, James W. Vallance, Yan Lavallée, Marc-Antoine Longpré; Controls on caldera structure: Results from analogue sandbox modeling. GSA Bulletin 2004;; 116 (5-6): 515–524. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B25228.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract We conducted scaled analogue sandbox models of caldera formation in order to understand the effects of chamber depth and orientation on the spatial and temporal development of calderas. Dry sand contained in a 1-m-diameter cylinder served as a crustal rock analogue, and a water-filled 0.6-m-diameter rubber bladder served as an analogue magma chamber. Scaling parameters included a length ratio (L*) of 2.5 × 10–5 and a stress ratio (σ*) of 1.8–2.4 × 10–5. In contrast to some previous analogue models, the viscosity of the fluid in the chamber and its withdrawal rate were properly scaled. Generally, deformation began with broad sagging, followed by an arcuate or linear outward-dipping fault that formed on one side of the caldera. This fault propagated laterally around the caldera in both directions, sometimes joining other faults, and typically forming an overall polygonal structure. As subsidence continued, the caldera grew incrementally outward and progressively formed a series of concentric outward-dipping faults. Lastly, a peripheral zone of extension and pronounced sagging, and commonly an inward- dipping outer fault related to extension, developed at the surface. As the depth of the chamber increased, (1) the area of faulting decreased, (2) the symmetry of the caldera was affected, and (3) the coherence of the subsiding block decreased. Tilting the chamber caused highly asymmetric subsidence to occur. In this case, faults formed first where the bladder was shallowest. Subsidence then shifted rapidly to where the bladder was deepest, producing an elongate trapdoor caldera that was deepest where the bladder was deepest. Our experiments highlight the roles of sagging and faulting during caldera subsidence. Surface fault patterns both in our experiments and at natural calderas are frequently not circular. The aspect ratio of the block above the magma chamber controls the shape of the caldera, which is frequently polygonal. The faults at natural calderas determine locations and migration of eruptive vents, the degree of subsidence, the style of postcal dera resurgent magmatism, and the extent of hydrothermal circulation. Our experiments reveal details of how calderas grow outward incrementally and demonstrate that asymmetric subsidence along linear and arcuate faults is common to many calderas. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,083
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,165

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations96
Publié2004
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGeological Society of America BulletinMême sujetearthquake and tectonic studiesTravaux en français237 207