MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166067027 · doi:10.5539/ijb.v2n2p246

Problems and Countermeasures in the Ecological Protection of Shenyang City

2010· article· en· W2166067027 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bingbing Cui

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcological civilizationEcologyConsciousnessPoliticsGeographyPolitical scienceEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental planningLawBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development and advance of city is the sign of human civilization, and the crystal of the mutualdevelopment of economy, politics, culture, and ecological environment for one age. In the ecological protection,Shenyang city has not protected and destroyed original public services from the view of cultural ecology. Thecause is that Shenyang city lacks in the consciousness to maintain the ecology, which seriously influences thedevelopment of Shenyang city and threatens human healthy, and has been an important factor to restrain thesustainable development of the city (Li, 2008). Aiming at this problem, many countermeasures such asestablishing the volunteer organization of ecological preservation and keeping feasible density are proposed inthis article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BiologySame topicRegional Development and EnvironmentFrench-language works237,207