MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166070955 · doi:10.1109/ias.1994.377652

Stream function distribution of petroleum liquids in relaxation tanks

2002· article· en· W2166070955 on OpenAlexaff
D. Thangaraj, Hao Wu, Shesha Jayaram

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelaxation (psychology)PetroleumPetroleum engineeringStorage tankFlow (mathematics)Function (biology)Benchmark (surveying)Pipeline transportMechanicsEnvironmental scienceEngineeringEnvironmental engineeringPhysicsChemistryWaste managementGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One important issue related to safety in handling petroleum liquids is the problem of charge relaxation of the low conductivity petroleum liquid in storage tanks. A relaxation tank placed in the upstream of the storage tank can considerably reduce the charging level of the liquid that enters the storage tank. In order to design a more effective relaxation tank, the stream function distribution of the liquid should be known accurately. In this paper a novel "rotated finite difference scheme", for a two dimensional steady state incompressible viscous fluid flow has been proposed. The notable feature of the scheme is the incorporation of the local characteristics of the streamline at any node to discretise the stream derivative part of the vorticity-transport equation.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207