MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166085242 · doi:10.1002/cmdc.201100492

Elucidation of the Structure–Activity Relationships of Apelin: Influence of Unnatural Amino Acids on Binding, Signaling, and Plasma Stability

2011· article· en· W2166085242 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Murza, Alexandre J. Parent, Élie Besserer‐Offroy, Hugo Tremblay, Félix Karadereye, Nicolas Beaudet, Richard Leduc, Philippe Sarret, Éric Marsault

Bibliographic record

VenueChemMedChem · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicApelin-related biomedical research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApelinReceptorChemistryAmino acidG protein-coupled receptorPeptideEndogenyHormoneBiochemistryLigand (biochemistry)StereochemistryCell biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apelin is the endogenous ligand of the APJ receptor, a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor family. The apelin-APJ complex has been detected in many tissues and is emerging as a promising target for several pathophysiological conditions. There is currently little information on the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of the apelin hormone. In an effort to better delineate SAR, we synthesized analogues of apelin-13 modified at selected positions with unnatural amino acids, with a particular emphasis on the C-terminal portion. Analogues were then tested in binding and functional assays by evaluating Gi/o-mediated decreases in cAMP levels and by assessing β-arrestin2 recruitment to the APJ receptor. The plasma stability of new compounds was also assessed. Several analogues were found to possess increased binding and higher stability than the parent peptide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemMedChemSame topicApelin-related biomedical researchFrench-language works237,207