Improved Decimal Floating-Point Logarithmic Converter Based on Selection by Rounding
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the algorithm and architecture of the decimal floating-point (DFP) logarithmic converter, based on the digit-recurrence algorithm with selection by rounding. The proposed approach can compute faithful DFP logarithm results for any one of the three DFP formats specified in the IEEE 754-2008 standard. In order to optimize the latency for the proposed design, we mainly integrate the following novel features: 1) using the redundant carry-save representation of the data path; 2) reducing the number of iterations by determining the number of initial iteration; and 3) retiming and balancing the delay of the proposed architecture. The proposed architecture is synthesized with STM 90-nm standard cell library and the results show that the critical path delay and the number of clock cycles of the proposed Decimal64 logarithmic converter are 1.55 ns (34.4 FO4) and 19, respectively, and the total hardware complexity is 43,572 NAND2 gates. The delay estimation results of the proposed architecture show that its latency is close to that of the binary radix-16 logarithmic converter, and that it has a significant decrease on latency compared with a recently published high performance CORDIC implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it