MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166090968 · doi:10.1109/iscc.2011.5984033

Hierarchically distributed tree

2011· article· en· W2166090968 on OpenAlexaff
Azzedine Boukerche, Yunfeng Gu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityTree (set theory)Tree structureFractal tree indexDistributed computingOverlayRouting (electronic design automation)Node (physics)Routing tableTable (database)Hierarchical database modelData structureInterval treeComputer networkData miningRouting protocolMathematicsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Hierarchically Distributed Tree (HD Tree) is a novel distributed data structure. The purpose of proposing this new data structure is for better maintaining data localities with exponentially expanding and extending rate, and at the same time adapting the hierarchical structure to the distributed environment. In HD Tree, the routing table size is determined by the system parameter k, the performance of all basic operations are bound by O(lg(n)). The add-on distributed structure in HD Tree generates multiple routes between any two nodes in the system, and the progressive routing in HD Tree can be conducted more strategically because of the global awareness about the location of each node. Operations in HD Tree can be designed highly error resilient, and the hierarchical nature in HD Tree makes load balancing straightforward, and it is massively scalable not only in multidimensional rang queries, but also in constructing and maintaining P2P overlay structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207