MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166124179 · doi:10.5539/ijps.v4n3p94

Function of Family-of-origin Experiences and Marital Adjustment among Married Iranian Students of Universiti Putra Malaysia

2012· article· en· W2166124179 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Soudabeh Ghoroghi, Siti Aishah Hassan, Maznah Baba

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Psychological Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAttachment and Relationship Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMarital statusRegression analysisTest (biology)Sample (material)DemographyClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyStatisticsSociologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between family-of-origin experiences and maritaladjustment in a sample of married postgraduate Iranian students in Malaysia. The sample consisted of 220married students who were randomly recruited to participate in the study through their email addresses. Therespondents completed demographic information and two questionnaires including Family-of-Origin Scale (FOS;Hovestadt, et al., 1985) and the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test (LWMAT; Locke & Wallace, 1959). Acorrelational survey design was utilized in the present study. Data analysis included frequencies, percentages,mean scores, Pearson's correlation, and multiple regression analysis. The results indicated that Family-of-originexperiences were positively and significantly correlated with marital adjustment. In addition, this study indicatedthat marital adjustment influences by family-of-origin experiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Psychological StudiesSame topicAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFrench-language works237,207