MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166133865 · doi:10.1093/jac/dkl540

Potential integration sites of the Salmonella genomic island 1 in Proteus mirabilis and other bacteria

2007· letter· en· W2166133865 on OpenAlexaff
Benoît Doublet, George R. Golding, Michael R. Mulvey, Axel Cloeckaert

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2007
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProteus mirabilisSalmonellaMicrobiologyGenomic islandProteusBacteriaBiologyEnterobacteriaceaeGeneticsEscherichia coliStaphylococcus aureusGenomeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir, We read with great interest the article of Ahmed et al. which described the occurrence of a variant Salmonella genomic island 1 (SGI1) in a clinical isolate of Proteus mirabilis.1 SGI1 was described initially in epidemic multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) phage type DT104 strains.2,3 The 43 kb SGI1 is located between the thdF and int2 genes of the chromosome of S. Typhimurium and contains an antibiotic resistance gene cluster conferring resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol/florfenicol, streptomycin/spectinomycin, sulphonamides and tetracyclines. The int2 gene is part of a retron sequence which has been reported only in S. Typhimurium.2,3 In other S. enterica serovars, SGI1 is located between the thdF and yidY genes.2,3 The antibiotic resistance gene cluster is located near the 3′ end of SGI1 and constitutes a complex class 1 integron called In104. Variant SGI1 antibiotic resistance gene clusters have been described in a wide variety of S. enterica serovars and have been named SGI1-A to SGI1-L.3–5 These gene clusters were likely generated after chromosomal recombinational events or by antibiotic resistance gene cassette replacement at one of the attI1 sites.3 Recently, SGI1 has been shown to be mobilized using the R55 conjugative plasmid and thus transferred by conjugation to Salmonella or Escherichia coli recipient strains.6 The site specific integration in Salmonella or E. coli occurs at the last 18 bp of the 3′ end of the thdF gene named attB. The attP site, which is almost identical to attB, is present on the mobile circular form of SGI1. Thus integration or excision of SGI1 into the chromosome occurs through homologous recombination between the attB and attP sites mediated by the integrase int gene which is the first gene found at the 5′ end of SGI1. SGI1 is thus considered to be an integrative mobilizable element.6 Interestingly, for the first time, Ahmed et al. identified SGI1 in a bacterium other than Salmonella.1 The antibiotic resistance gene cluster identified corresponded to that of the SGI1-L complex integron reported previously in S. Newport where the aadA2 gene cassette is replaced by a dfrA15 trimethoprim resistance gene cassette at the first attI1 site of this complex integron.5 However, although a circular extrachromosomal form of SGI1 was detected in P. mirabilis, the authors failed to identify the integration site in the P. mirabilis chromosome.1 The authors used the primers U7-L12 (targeting the Salmonella thdF gene) and LJ-R1 (targeting the SGI1 int gene) to confirm by PCR the location of SGI1 downstream of thdF in the Salmonella chromosome. Since this PCR failed to produce an amplicon in P. mirabilis 18306, the authors concluded that the integration site of SGI1 into the chromosome of P. mirabilis 18306 may be different from that of S. enterica.1 Using the Blastn algorithm (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) we searched for a thdF gene homologue in the P. mirabilis strain HI4320 sequenced genome (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/cgi-bin/blast/submitblast/p_mirabilis) and identified one gene that is 70% identical in nucleotide sequence to that of the S. Typhimurium thdF gene. The last 18 bp of the putative P. mirabilis thdF gene had a nucleotide sequence that was 100% identical to that of the SGI1 attP site and thus likely constitutes the attB site in P. mirabilis. In S. enterica serovars or E. coli, the attB sites usually differ in 1–2 bp from the SGI1 attP site.6 Analysis of the potential U7-L12 (20-mer primer) binding site in the thdF gene of the P. mirabilis strain HI4320 sequenced genome revealed seven nucleotide differences which may explain why the PCR failed to generate an amplicon. The identification of SGI1 in a P. mirabilis clinical isolate is of great interest as the spread of the multidrug resistance phenotype in conjunction with the potential for enhanced virulence has significant clinical implications. Since the SGI1 may also spread to other bacterial species, we searched for potential attB target sites of SGI1 in bacteria other than Salmonella and E. coli, using several databases and Blastn. The bacteria found with a potential attB SGI1 target site differing in no more than three nucleotides from the SGI1 attP site are listed in Table 1. The fact that potential attB sites were identified in diverse bacteria such as Shigella spp., Vibrio spp., Pseudomonas spp., Brucella spp., Legionella pneumophila and Klebsiella pneumoniae raises the potential for SGI1 to emerge in other human pathogens. Of particular interest in the evolution of SGI1 is that in some Shewanella genome sequencing projects, parts of SGI1 are found downstream of the respective thdF gene, also named trmE in the following database (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/mic_home.html). Potential attB SGI1 target sites at the 3′ end of the thdFa gene in bacteria other than Salmonella and E. coli aThe thdF gene is also called trmE or mnmE. bIn the strains indicated by an asterisk, parts of SGI1 are found downstream of the thdF gene. cNucleotide differences from the SGI1 attP site are underlined. Potential attB SGI1 target sites at the 3′ end of the thdFa gene in bacteria other than Salmonella and E. coli aThe thdF gene is also called trmE or mnmE. bIn the strains indicated by an asterisk, parts of SGI1 are found downstream of the thdF gene. cNucleotide differences from the SGI1 attP site are underlined. In conclusion, the horizontal transfer of SGI1 may play an important role in the dissemination of multidrug resistance and potential virulence not only among S. enterica serovars but also among other bacterial genera of clinical importance. None to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0150.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207