MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166141986 · doi:10.1109/arith.2011.17

On the Fixed-Point Accuracy Analysis and Optimization of FFT Units with CORDIC Multipliers

2011· article· en· W2166141986 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCORDICFast Fourier transformTwiddle factorSplit-radix FFT algorithmFixed-point arithmeticQuantization (signal processing)Prime-factor FFT algorithmComputer scienceAlgorithmFloating pointLTI system theoryArithmeticMathematicsField-programmable gate arrayFourier transformLinear systemComputer hardwareFourier analysisFractional Fourier transform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fixed-point Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) units are widely used in digital communication systems. The twiddle multipliers required for realizing large FFTs are typically implemented with the Coordinate Rotation Digital Computer (CORDIC) algorithm to restrict memory requirements. Recent approaches aiming to optimize the bit-widths of FFT units while satisfying a given maximum bound on Mean-Square-Error (MSE) mostly focus on the architectures with integer multipliers. They ignore the quantization error of coefficients, disabling them to analyze the exact error defined as the difference between the fixed-point circuit and the reference floating-point model. This paper presents an efficient analysis of MSE as well as an optimization algorithm for CORDIC-based FFT units, which is applicable to other Linear-Time-Invariant (LTI) circuits as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical Methods and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207