MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166157325 · doi:10.1109/tie.2008.918636

A New Resonant Gate-Drive Circuit With Efficient Energy Recovery and Low Conduction Loss

2008· article· en· W2166157325 on OpenAlexaff
Wilson Eberle, Yan‐Fei Liu, P.C. Sen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInductanceGate driverRLC circuitMOSFETElectrical engineeringPower MOSFETThermal conductionResonant inverterPower (physics)Electronic circuitMaterials scienceLogic gateVoltageElectronic engineeringEngineeringCapacitorInverterPhysicsTransistor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a new resonant gate-drive circuit is proposed to recover a portion of the power-MOSFET-gate energy that is typically dissipated in high-frequency converters. The proposed circuit consists of four control switches and a small resonant inductance. The current through the resonant inductance is discontinuous in order to minimize circulating-current conduction loss that is present in other methods. The proposed circuit also achieves quick turn-on and turn-off transition times to reduce switching and conduction losses in power MOSFETs. An analysis, a design procedure, and experimental results are presented for the proposed circuit. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed driver can recover 51% of the gate energy at 5-V gate-drive voltage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations103
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207