MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166176559 · doi:10.1109/crv.2011.59

Precise High Speed Multi-Target Multi-Sensor Local Positioning System

2011· article· en· W2166176559 on OpenAlexafffund
Justin A. Eichel, David A. Clausi, Paul Fieguth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInertial measurement unitComputer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceVideo trackingTracking systemOrientation (vector space)Global Positioning SystemLow latency (capital markets)Robustness (evolution)Object (grammar)Kalman filterMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When used for tracking, the combination of infrared (IR) and an internal measurement unit (IMU) allows researchers and industry to locate objects to within 1 cm at over 200 Hz with a latency less than 2 ms. This novel tracking system uses multiple cameras to triangulate an IR LED placed on the object and utilizes IMU data to measure the object's orientation and allow the system to be robust against visual occlusions. The cost-effective IR system is robust against illumination allowing the object to be tracked at over 50 feet from the camera positions. This distance is expected to increase with additional development. This paper describes the preliminary algorithms that utilize the information from both the IR and IMU systems in order to precisely track an object. The algorithms are tested against simulated data generated from profiling the hardware and real data collected from a system prototype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207