MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166180284 · doi:10.1086/377132

Infection of Placental Trophoblasts by<i>Toxoplasma gondii</i>

2003· article· en· W2166180284 on OpenAlexafffund
Marjan Abbasi, Kinga Kowalewska‐Grochowska, Mohammad Ali Bahar, Ruhangiz T. Kilani, Bonnie Winkler‐Lowen, Larry J. Guilbert

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Alberta HospitalProvincial Laboratory of Public Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChildren's Health Foundation
KeywordsToxoplasma gondiiTrophoblastBiologyVacuoleApoptosisIntracellular parasiteTumor necrosis factor alphaVirologyImmunologyIntracellularCytotoxic T cellPlacentaMicrobiologyCell biologyFetusAntibodyIn vitroPregnancyCytoplasmGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How the intracellular parasite Toxoplasma gondii causes placental inflammation and infects the fetus is unknown. By use of a culture model of primary human trophoblasts, we examined the consequences of infection by a virulent strain of T. gondii. Infection fractions (parasitophorous vacuoles per trophoblast nuclei) < or =0.9 were observed 1 day after challenge at an inoculum ratio of T. gondii to nuclei of 10. The culture content of infectious T. gondii increased 45-fold in 48 h. Two days after infection, almost 30% of trophoblast nuclei became apoptotic, and 30%-35% of nuclei were lost. Almost 90% of apoptotic nuclei were not adjacent to a parasitophorous vacuole, suggesting infection protected against apoptosis. However, there was no T. gondii-dependent accumulation of putative cytotoxic factors, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, that could mediate paracrine killing. Both mature and immature trophoblasts can be productively infected, and uninfected, but not infected, cells undergo apoptosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations94
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicToxoplasma gondii Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207