Efeito da aplicação foliar de biofertilizantes, bioestimulantes e micronutrientes na cultura do tomateiro (Lycopersicon esculetum Mill.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of foliar biofertilizer application and biostimulants, besides their combination in the growth and in the number of fruits and racemo of tomato culture, cv. Jumbo (Lycopersicon esculetum Mill.). The experiment was carried out in the county of Marialva, north of Paraná, in area of Terra Roxa Estruturada Eutrófica. The experimental design used was randomized completed with four replicates, as each plot was composed by two lines of plants driven by vertical tutor. Fourteen days after the transplant 10 pulverizations were accomplished with weekly intervals. The treatments were: Aminon- 25, Microfol, Biofertilizers without micronutritious, Biofertilizers plus micronutritious, Aminon-25 +microfol, as the treatment without any product to check. The treatments that contained micronutritious, increased the number of fruits for plant, not differing statistically from each other, however. Regarding to the racemo number, the treatments that contained biostimulants were the best ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".