MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166199460

Review of prediction methods for low-elevation aerospace systems and new achievements

2011· article· en· W2166199460 on OpenAlexaff
J. Lemorton, Vincent Fabbro, Charilaos I. Kourogiorgas, Pierre Bouchard, D. W. Rogers, Lorenzo Luini, Carlo Riva, Danielle Vanhoenacker‐Janvier, F. Lacoste, Lars Erling Bråten, Laurent Castanet

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElevation (ballistics)Multipath propagationUltra high frequencyFadingElevation angleRemote sensingRange (aeronautics)Non-line-of-sight propagationComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyAerospace engineeringAzimuthTelecommunicationsGeologyEngineeringGeographyWirelessPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned Airborne Vehicles (UAV) datalinks are among the most critical technologies in a large number of future UAV applications. The main characteristics of Line Of Sight (LOS) datalinks for UAV are medium and long range paths, and low elevation angle, whereas the frequency may range from VHF and UHF up to Ku and Ka bands. As far as available statistical prediction models are concerned, there is a lack of accurate and validated models for this type of low-elevation long-range configuration, for gas, cloud, and rain attenuation, as well as scintillation and multipath fading. The paper will review the most recent developments that have been performed to improve this situation, and collaborative activity conducted and planned in the framework of COST 0802 Action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))Same topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207